| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index |
| Date: | 2020-04-06 02:47:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20200406024757.GA2066@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 03:54:38PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Now, would it be better to apply the refactoring patch for HEAD before
> feature freeze, or are people fine if this is committed a bit after?
> Patch 0002 is neither a new feature, nor an actual bug, and just some
> code cleanup, but I am a bit worried about applying that cleanup on
> HEAD just after the freeze.
I have worked more on this one this morning and just applied the bug
fix down to 9.5, and the refactoring on HEAD. Thanks!
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2020-04-06 02:56:51 | 2pc leaks fds |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2020-04-06 01:54:09 | Re: Reinitialize stack base after fork (for the benefit of rr)? |