Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index
Date: 2020-04-06 02:47:57
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 03:54:38PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Now, would it be better to apply the refactoring patch for HEAD before
> feature freeze, or are people fine if this is committed a bit after?
> Patch 0002 is neither a new feature, nor an actual bug, and just some
> code cleanup, but I am a bit worried about applying that cleanup on
> HEAD just after the freeze.

I have worked more on this one this morning and just applied the bug
fix down to 9.5, and the refactoring on HEAD. Thanks!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-04-06 02:56:51 2pc leaks fds
Previous Message Andres Freund 2020-04-06 01:54:09 Re: Reinitialize stack base after fork (for the benefit of rr)?