Re: wraparound dangers in snapshot too old

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: wraparound dangers in snapshot too old
Date: 2020-04-01 16:13:54
Message-ID: 20200401161354.fst2c2wdiuzilljb@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2020-03-31 21:53:04 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I am trying to change the snapshot too old infrastructure so it
> cooperates with my snapshot scalability patch. While trying to
> understand the code sufficiently, I think I found a fairly serious
> issue:

I accidentally sent this email, I was intending to instead only send
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200401064008.qob7bfnnbu4w5cw4%40alap3.anarazel.de

It started to happen because of some default keybinding changes between
mutt / emacs / magit, leading to emacs sending a buffer as an email,
which I didn't intend.

Sorry for that,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais 2020-04-01 16:17:35 Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-04-01 16:12:24 Re: A bug when use get_bit() function for a long bytea string