Re: pgbench - refactor init functions with buffers

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench - refactor init functions with buffers
Date: 2020-03-28 19:34:16
Message-ID: 20200328193416.427gb6rchibu2zka@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-03-28 15:16:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > - both stringinfo and pqexpbuffer are performance relevant in some uses,
> > needing to optimize both is wasted effort
>
> I'm not aware that anybody is trying to micro-optimize either.

https://postgr.es/m/5450.1578797036%40sss.pgh.pa.us

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2020-03-28 19:35:07 Re: ssl passphrase callback
Previous Message Andres Freund 2020-03-28 19:30:40 Re: Catalog invalidations vs catalog scans vs ScanPgRelation()