| From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | bruce(at)momjian(dot)us |
| Cc: | fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: backend type in log_line_prefix? |
| Date: | 2020-03-27 07:30:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20200327.163007.128069746774242774.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello.
At Mon, 23 Mar 2020 18:38:53 -0400, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote in
> Patch applied to master, thanks.
The patch (8e8a0becb3) named archiver process as just "archiver". On
the other hand the discussion in the thread [1] was going to name the
process as "WAL/wal archiver". As all other processes related to WAL
are named as walreceiver, walsender, walwriter, wouldn't we name the
process like "wal archiver"?
[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200319195410.icib45bbgjwqb5zn@alap3.anarazel.de
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-03-27 07:31:15 | Re: shared-memory based stats collector |
| Previous Message | John Naylor | 2020-03-27 07:16:12 | Re: Unicode normalization SQL functions |