Re: PostgreSQL 13: native JavaScript Procedural Language support ?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Ivan E(dot) Panchenko" <i(dot)panchenko(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 13: native JavaScript Procedural Language support ?
Date: 2020-03-26 10:28:11
Message-ID: 20200326102811.GD4572@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:07:48AM +0300, Ivan Panchenko wrote:
>
> On 26.03.2020 03:50, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 05:46:27PM +0200, Marius Andreiana wrote:
> > > Thanks Tom, that makes sense. Appreciate your time to explain the context.
> > >
> > > I'll followup with Heroku.
> > Also, I have heard PL/V8 is very hard to build for packagers (because of
> > changes by Google in the way V8 is packaged), which has decreased PL/V8
> > adoption.
>
> True.
>
> Btw, Nginx made their own JS implementation
>
> https://nginx.org/en/docs/njs/index.html
>
> It might be easier in integration than V8.

Oh, that sounds promising. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daulat Ram 2020-03-26 10:42:46 core. files inside base directory
Previous Message J2eeInside J2eeInside 2020-03-26 08:03:08 Re: Replacing Apache Solr with Postgre Full Text Search?