Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Georgios Kokolatos <gkokolatos(at)pm(dot)me>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++
Date: 2020-03-26 03:58:44
Message-ID: 20200326035844.GB1471@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 12:22:48AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, the comment needs an update; but if we have four implementations
> then it ought to describe each of them, IMO.

I got an idea as per the attached. Perhaps you have a better idea?
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
assert-comments.patch text/x-diff 968 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-03-26 04:00:17 Re: pgbench - add \aset to store results of a combined query
Previous Message wjzeng 2020-03-26 03:38:39 Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables