Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other
Date: 2020-03-25 19:51:35
Message-ID: 20200325195135.rv7ik2ebnvt6242x@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2020-03-25 15:24:44 -0400, James Coleman wrote:
> Andres: If we got this fixed in current PG would you be opposed to
> documenting the caveat in previous versions?

Not really. I'm just not confident it's going to be useful, given the
amount of details needed to be provided to really make sense of the
issue (the earlier CIC phases don't wait for snapshots, but just
relation locks etc).

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-03-25 19:58:41 Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-03-25 19:44:28 Re: plan cache overhead on plpgsql expression