Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting for pg_basebackup, in the server side

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan A&PS Delivery)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting for pg_basebackup, in the server side
Date: 2020-03-19 18:39:28
Message-ID: 20200319183928.rennw23ej4ohgubc@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2020-03-19 17:21:38 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Pushed! Thanks!

FWIW, I'm a bit doubtful that incuring the overhead of this by default
on everybody is a nice thing. On filesystems with high latency and with
a lot of small relations the overhead of stating a lot of files can be
almost as high as the actual base backup.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-03-19 18:43:55 Re: Some improvements to numeric sqrt() and ln()
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2020-03-19 18:30:02 Re: Adding missing object access hook invocations