| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski <me(at)komzpa(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill) |
| Date: | 2020-03-18 00:26:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20200318002636.gkursyzaoktcylk3@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2020-03-17 01:14:02 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> lazy_check_needs_freeze() is only called for an aggressive vacuum, which
> this isn't.
Hm? I mean some of these will be aggressive vacuums, because it's older
than vacuum_freeze_table_age? And the lower age limit would make that
potentially more painful, no?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nikita Glukhov | 2020-03-18 00:27:37 | Re: [PATCH] Opclass parameters |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-03-18 00:07:10 | Re: pgsql: Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API. |