Re: shared-memory based stats collector

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, ah(at)cybertec(dot)at, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: shared-memory based stats collector
Date: 2020-03-13 17:09:00
Message-ID: 20200313170900.oudqri2wlj5ok4q7@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2020-03-13 16:34:50 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Thank you very much!!
>
> At Thu, 12 Mar 2020 20:13:24 -0700, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote in
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thomas, could you look at the first two patches here, and my review
> > questions?
> >
> >
> > General comments about this series:
> > - A lot of the review comments feel like I've written them before, a
> > year or more ago. I feel this patch ought to be in a much better
> > state. There's a lot of IMO fairly obvious stuff here, and things that
> > have been mentioned multiple times previously.
>
> I apologize for all of the obvious stuff or things that have been
> mentioned.. I'll address them.
>
> > - There's a *lot* of typos in here. I realize being an ESL is hard, but
> > a lot of these can be found with the simplest spellchecker. That's
> > one thing for a patch that just has been hacked up as a POC, but this
> > is a multi year thread?
>
> I'll review all changed part again. I used ispell but I should have
> failed to check much of the changes.
>
> > - There's some odd formatting. Consider using pgindent more regularly.
>
> I'll do so.
>
> > More detailed comments below.
>
> Thank you very much for the intensive review, I'm going to revise the
> patch according to them.
>
> > I'm considering rewriting the parts of the patchset that I don't like -
> > but it'll look quite different afterwards.

I take your response to mean that you'd prefer to evolve the patch
largely on your own? I'm mainly asking because I think there's some
chance that we could till get this into v13, but if so we'll have to go
for it now.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2020-03-13 17:15:46 Re: explain HashAggregate to report bucket and memory stats
Previous Message James Coleman 2020-03-13 17:06:33 Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)