Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski <me(at)komzpa(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)
Date: 2020-03-10 05:00:05
Message-ID: 20200310050005.GA11448@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> +++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample
> +#autovacuum_vacuum_insert_threshold = 10000000 # min number of row inserts
> + # before vacuum

Similar to a previous comment [0] about reloptions or GUC:

Can we say "threshold number of insertions before vacuum" ?
..or "maximum number of insertions before triggering autovacuum"

--
Justin

[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/602873766faa0e9200a60dcc26dc10c636761d5d.camel%40cybertec.at

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message movead li 2020-03-10 05:13:42 Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2020-03-10 04:54:18 Re: Some problems of recovery conflict wait events