From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Crash by targetted recovery |
Date: | 2020-03-10 05:59:00 |
Message-ID: | 20200310.145900.21675815166709370.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:50:52 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote in
> Pushed the v5-0001-Tidy-up-XLogSource-usage.patch!
Thanks!
> Regarding the remaining patch adding the regression test,
I didn't seriously inteneded it to be in the tree.
> +$result =
> + $node_standby->safe_psql('postgres', "SELECT
> pg_last_wal_replay_lsn()");
> +my ($seg, $off) = split('/', $result);
> +my $target = sprintf("$seg/%08X", (hex($off) / $segsize + 1) *
> $segsize);
>
> What happens if "off" part gets the upper limit and "seg" part needs
> to be incremented? What happens if pg_last_wal_replay_lsn() advances
> very much (e.g., because of autovacuum) beyond the segment boundary
> until the standby restarts? Of course, these situations very rarely
> happen,
> but I'd like to avoid adding such not stable test if possible.
In the first place the "seg" is "fileno". Honestly I don't think the
test doesn't reach to fileno boundary but I did in the attached. Since
perl complains over-32bit integer arithmetic as incomptible, the
calculation gets a bit odd shape to avoid over-32bit arithmetic.
For the second point, which seems more likely to happen, I added the
VACUUM/pg_switch_wal() sequence then wait standby for catch up, before
doing the test.
Does it make sense?
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v5-0001-TAP-test-for-a-crash-bug.patch | text/x-patch | 3.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-03-10 06:11:21 | Re: shared-memory based stats collector |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2020-03-10 05:58:01 | Re: logical copy_replication_slot issues |