Re: shared-memory based stats collector

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: andres(at)anarazel(dot)de
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, ah(at)cybertec(dot)at, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: shared-memory based stats collector
Date: 2020-03-10 03:29:01
Message-ID: 20200310.122901.1243747093990813469.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:27:25 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> That's true, but I have the same concern with Tom. The archive bacame
> too-tightly linked with other processes than actual relation. We may
> need the second static shared memory segment apart from the current
> one.

Anyway, I changed the target version of the entry to 14.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-03-10 03:34:20 Re: shared-memory based stats collector
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-03-10 03:27:25 Re: shared-memory based stats collector