Re: No mention about somaxconn

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No mention about somaxconn
Date: 2020-03-06 18:06:57
Message-ID: 20200306180657.fybtyz72lyxjn4kr@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Hi,

On 2020-03-03 10:48:56 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> Currently there's no mention about net.core.somaxconn parameter needs
> to be adjusted if max_connections is large and UNIX domain socket is
> used for connection. Since the default for the kernel parameter is
> small (typically 128), it is easy to hit the limitation and you will
> get errors something like:
>
> could not connect to server: Resource temporarily unavailable
>
> I don't know if this should be applied to other OS as well though.

Yea, that'd be good. Care to suggest a patch?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2020-03-09 15:20:10 invalid parser name
Previous Message PG Doc comments form 2020-03-06 07:08:01 reassign owned requirement of locks