Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench
Date: 2020-03-04 13:05:30
Message-ID: 20200304130530.GO2593@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 11:31:27AM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> No objection. I did not know there was such a thing…
>
> Maybe a more detailed explanation about PG_COLOR could be stored somewhere,
> and all affected tools could link to it? Or not.

One argument against that position is that each tool may just handle a
subset of the full set available, and that some of the subsets may
partially intersect. Fun.

> For "pgbench", you could also add the standard sentence that it uses libpq
> environment variables, as it is also missing?

Yeah, that's true. Let's fix this part while on it.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Fan 2020-03-04 13:13:54 Re: [PATCH] Erase the distinctClause if the result is unique by definition
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-03-04 13:01:39 Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench