| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexey Bashtanov <bashtanov(at)imap(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans |
| Date: | 2020-02-07 21:35:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20200207213519.mjgcvnpz6gn7pkyd@development |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 03:22:12PM +0000, Alexey Bashtanov wrote:
>Hello,
>
>>It took me a while to figure out what those names mean. "unfetched",
>>as you call it on the code, may be more descriptive than "avoided" for
>>the new label. However I think the other two are more confusing. It
>>may be a good idea to change them together with this.
>It'll be sad if this patch is forgotten only because of the words choice.
>I've changed it all to "unfetched" for at least not to call the same
>thing differently
>in the code and in the output, and also rebased it and fit in 80 lines
>width limit.
>
I kinda suspect one of the ressons why this got so little attention is
that it was never added to any CF.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-02-07 21:56:27 | Draft release notes are up for review |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-02-07 21:15:18 | Re: Reducing WaitEventSet syscall churn |