| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process |
| Date: | 2020-02-04 05:28:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20200204052857.GA43899@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 01:37:25AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2020-01-23 15:49:37 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I assume that's probably discussed on the thread that is linked here,
>> but you shouldn't have to dig through the discussion thread to figure
>> out what the benefits of a change like this are.
>
> which I fully agree with.
>
> It's not at all clear to me that the potential downsides of this have
> been fully thought through. And even if they have, they've not been
> documented.
There is this, and please let me add a reference to another complaint
I had about this commit:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200122055510.GH174860@paquier.xyz
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2020-02-04 05:29:51 | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2020-02-04 05:20:39 | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |