| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers |
| Date: | 2020-01-30 20:45:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20200130204536.GA2378@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Jan-30, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Agreed about backbranches. I'd like to preserve the word "transaction"
> as it is more familiar to users. How about something like the follows?
>
> "transactions are completed up to log time %s"
That's a good point. I used the phrase "transaction activity", which
seems sufficiently explicit to me.
So, the attached is the one for master; in back branches I would use the
same (plus minor conflict fixes), except that I would drop the message
wording changes.
Thanks for the reviews so far,
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-Use-CheckPoint-time-to-update-latest-recovery-tim.patch | text/x-diff | 8.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-01-30 20:50:21 | Re: Hash join not finding which collation to use for string hashing |
| Previous Message | Melanie Plageman | 2020-01-30 20:38:22 | Re: BufFileRead() error signalling |