| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Add a non-strict version of jsonb_set |
| Date: | 2020-01-29 11:49:33 |
| Message-ID: | 20200129114933.GJ145179@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 09:54:23AM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 4:36 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Another thing that would be nice is to warn about commits that don't
>> include a "Description:" line. I have been trying to be religious
>> about that, but I seem to periodically apostatize.
I had to look at a dictionary for this one..
> We'd also have to come to this magic actual agreement on which such
> fields we *want* :) Which alone would be an improvement.
Well, there has been some discussion about this matter on the lists
not so long ago:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABUevEzauoMm3irCyg4s=vUX5hUcKmTW_R69fiKS4+72gzyAOw@mail.gmail.com
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+hUKGJR+YtZUdq9_6cFsqCRH_fvfumdDZgmiLwXBHCrTJUGmw@mail.gmail.com
And it seems to me that the only consensus we reached was about having
"Discussion:", while the other tags were not that popular.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-01-29 14:58:54 | pgsql: Fail if recovery target is not reached |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2020-01-29 08:54:23 | Re: pgsql: Add a non-strict version of jsonb_set |