Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers
Date: 2020-01-28 14:18:50
Message-ID: 20200128141850.GA30624@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Jan-27, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Actually looking again, getRecordTimestamp is looking pretty strange.
> It looks much more natural by using nested switch/case blocks, as with
> this diff. I think the compiler does a better job this way too.

I hadn't noticed I forgot to attach the diff here :-(

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
rewrite-getRecordTimestamp.patch text/x-diff 2.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kohei KaiGai 2020-01-28 14:32:49 Re: Is custom MemoryContext prohibited?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-01-28 14:18:14 Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers