| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: making the backend's json parser work in frontend code |
| Date: | 2020-01-23 18:20:27 |
| Message-ID: | 20200123182027.GA28825@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Jan-23, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 01:05:50PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > > Another
> > > problem, though, is how do you _flag_ file names as being
> > > base64-encoded? Use another JSON field to specify that?
> >
> > Alvaro's proposed solution in the message to which you replied was to
> > call the field either 'path' or 'path_base64' depending on whether
> > base-64 escaping was used. That seems better to me than having a field
> > called 'path' and a separate field called 'is_path_base64' or
> > whatever.
>
> Hmm, so the JSON key name is the flag --- interesting.
Yes, because if you use the same key name, you risk a dumb tool writing
the file name as the encoded name. That's worse because it's harder to
figure out that it's wrong.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-01-23 18:22:19 | Re: making the backend's json parser work in frontend code |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-01-23 18:11:01 | Re: making the backend's json parser work in frontend code |