Re: error context for vacuum to include block number

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
Date: 2020-01-21 20:54:59
Message-ID: 20200121205459.GA28351@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Jan-21, Justin Pryzby wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 03:11:35PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > Some of them conflicts with the current HEAD(62c9b52231). Please rebase them.
>
> Sorry, it's due to other vacuum patch in this branch.
>
> New patches won't conflict, except for the 0005, so I renamed it for cfbot.
> If it's deemed to be useful, I'll make a separate branch for the others.

I think you have to have some other patches applied before these,
because in the context lines for some of the hunks there are
double-slash comments.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2020-01-21 21:21:46 Add MAIN_RELATION_CLEANUP and SECONDARY_RELATION_CLEANUP options to VACUUM
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2020-01-21 20:49:33 Re: error context for vacuum to include block number