| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Jobin Augustine <jobinau(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: libpq parameter parsing problem |
| Date: | 2020-01-14 21:56:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20200114215617.GA18330@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 2020-Jan-14, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 12:01:43PM +0530, Jobin Augustine wrote:
> > Yes, agree, readability is better with that modification.
> > Attaching a modified patch.
>
> (Please always top-post, this is the style of the PostgreSQL community
> mailing lists). The new patch looks good to me, let's see if others
> have extra thoughts to share. If not, I'll try to commit it.
The thought I had when I first saw this was that it would be better to
have a minimal, coherent set of useful examples all together in a
subsection called Examples. But then I realized that random examples
are already scattered here and there in the libpq page, so while I still
think that that would be better, I no longer think it's this patch's
responsibility to make it so.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-01-14 21:59:42 | Re: DROP OWNED CASCADE vs Temp tables |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2020-01-14 21:41:11 | Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY unexpectedly fails |