Re: Greatest Common Divisor

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Greatest Common Divisor
Date: 2020-01-03 22:31:31
Message-ID: 20200103223131.GA30702@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Jan-03, Robert Haas wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 4:11 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Maybe a very simple solution is indeed to have a separate pg_math or
> > pg_extra or whatever, which by default is *last* in the search_path.
> > That would make a user's gcd() be chosen preferently, if one exists.
>
> Then every time we add a function, or anything else, we can bikeshed
> about whether it should go in pg_catalog or pg_extra!

Yeah, I was just thinking about that :-) I was thinking that all
standard-mandated functions, as well as system functions, should be in
pg_catalog; and otherwise stuff should not get in the user's way.

> FWIW, EnterpriseDB has something like this for Advanced Server, and it
> actually adds a fair amount of complexity, much of it around
> OverrideSearchPath. It's not unmanageable, but it's not trivial,
> either.

Oh, hmm. okay.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vik Fearing 2020-01-03 22:57:54 Re: Greatest Common Divisor
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-01-03 22:13:35 Re: Greatest Common Divisor