Re: Greatest Common Divisor

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Greatest Common Divisor
Date: 2020-01-03 21:10:43
Message-ID: 20200103211043.GA597@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Jan-03, Merlin Moncure wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 1:32 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> > True, but because of the way search_path is typically set, they'd
> > probably continue to get their own version anyway, so I'm not sure
> > what the problem is.
>
> Is that right? Default search_path is for pg_catalog to resolve before
> public. Lightly testing with a hand rolled pg_advisory_lock
> implementation that raise a notice, my default database seemed to
> prefer the build in function. Maybe I'm not following you.

Maybe a very simple solution is indeed to have a separate pg_math or
pg_extra or whatever, which by default is *last* in the search_path.
That would make a user's gcd() be chosen preferently, if one exists.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2020-01-03 21:14:22 Re: Greatest Common Divisor
Previous Message Chapman Flack 2020-01-03 21:06:31 Re: Greatest Common Divisor