Re: Greatest Common Divisor

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Greatest Common Divisor
Date: 2020-01-02 14:57:12
Message-ID: 20200102145712.GN3195@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greetings,

* Dean Rasheed (dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> I'm not objecting to adding it, I'm just curious. In fact, I think
> that if we do add this, then we should probably add lcm() at the same
> time, since handling its overflow cases is sufficiently non-trivial to
> justify not requiring users to have to implement it themselves.

I tend to agree with this.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-01-02 15:12:41 Re: Greatest Common Divisor
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2020-01-02 14:50:44 Re: Greatest Common Divisor