Re: Misleading comment in pg_upgrade.c

On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 11:45:09PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 5 Dec 2019, at 10:17, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > While reading pg_upgrade code to restore the objects on the new
> > cluster, I noticed that 5b570d771b8 didn't adjust the database name in
> > the comments explaining the requirements for an extra "--clean" for
> > template1 and postgres databases. While it's true that both databases
> > will already exist, I found it confusing to mention both names when
> > only one is processed for each code path.
>
> Agreed, I think this reads better.

FYI, this patch was applied:

commit 690c880269
Author: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Date: Fri Dec 6 11:55:04 2019 +0900

Improve some comments in pg_upgrade.c

When restoring database schemas on a new cluster, database "template1"
is processed first, followed by all other databases in parallel,
including "postgres". Both "postgres" and "template1" have some extra
handling to propagate each one's properties, but comments were confusing
regarding which one is processed where.

Author: Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOBaU_a2iviTG7FE10yO_gcW+zQCHNFhRA_NDiktf3UR65BHdw@mail.gmail.com

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +