| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Andres Freund' <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, 'Fujii Masao' <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'Fabrízio de Royes Mello' <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'legrand legrand' <legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com>, 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, 'Pgsql Hackers' <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hooks for session start and end, take two |
| Date: | 2019-12-20 14:18:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20191220141807.GA28993@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Dec-20, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 02:45:26AM +0000, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
> > I've got interested in this. What's the current status of this
> > patch? The CF entry shows it was committed.
> >
> > But I understood not, because the relevant code doesn't appear in
> > HEAD, and Git log shows that it was reverted. Am I correct?
>
> The patch has been committed once as of e788bd9, then reverted as of
> 9555cc8 because it had a couple of fundamental issues and many people
> were not happy with it.
Hmm, should we mark the commitfest entry as rejected then? Having it be
marked committed seems pretty confusing. The next version of the patch
would have its own CF entry, I presume.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-12-20 14:23:40 | Re: Hooks for session start and end, take two |
| Previous Message | Mark Lorenz | 2019-12-20 14:08:18 | Re: Created feature for to_date() conversion using patterns 'YYYY-WW', 'YYYY-WW-D', 'YYYY-MM-W' and 'YYYY-MM-W-D' |