|From:||Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>|
|To:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>|
|Cc:||Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, ranier_gyn(at)hotmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org|
|Subject:||Re: [Proposal] Level4 Warnings show many shadow vars|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 09:36:13AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> As that's a confusion I introduced with d9fadbf, I would like to fix
> that and backpatch this change down to 11. (Ranier gets the
> authorship per se as that's extracted from a larger patch).
Committed that part.
I got to look at the rest of the stuff discussed, and I am not sure
that any of the changes are actually things which improve
Let's take one example. The changes in pg_dump/ like
/progname/prog_name/ have just been done in haste, without actual
thoughts about how the problem ought to be fixed. And in this case,
something which could be more adapted is to remove the argument from
usage() because progname is a global variable, initialized from the
beginning in pg_restore.
|Next Message||Peter Geoghegan||2019-12-18 01:29:27||Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.|
|Previous Message||Bruce Momjian||2019-12-18 01:17:58||Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.|