Re: more backtraces

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: more backtraces
Date: 2019-12-15 21:28:50
Message-ID: 20191215212849.GA28794@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Dec-15, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

> > Being able to get debugging information from
> > failures that happen on those installations that enables us to fix
> > things without having to go through a time-consuming process of
> > guesswork and attempted reproduction is really valuable. A stack trace
> > can turn a lengthy nightmare into a quick fix.
>
> I think you are supposing that these traces will be as useful as gdb
> traces. They won't. In particular, where a gdb trace will almost
> always localize the problem to a line of C code, with these you're
> quite lucky if you can even localize to a specific function.

That's already been my experience :-(

> I think that the most useful next steps would involve trying to get
> better printouts from the cases this code already traps,

+1

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2019-12-15 21:35:54 Re: psql's \watch is broken
Previous Message Greg Stark 2019-12-15 20:45:31 Re: On disable_cost