From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Using XLogFileNameP in critical section |
Date: | 2019-12-04 04:55:23 |
Message-ID: | 20191204045523.GE2381@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 11:24:57AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> So it seems that the problem might really be a faulty rule in our
> MSVC build script about when postgres.def needs to be regenerated?
> Or else it's some weird caching problem on drongo --- the lack of
> complaints from other Windows critters might point the finger
> that way.
Yes, I saw the failure from the buildfarm logs, but I got to the
conclusion that the animal just got crazy with a portion of its
caching because there are no more references to routine removed. So I
did not bother much.
FWIW, I have seen sometimes similar warnings regarding conflicting
projects when doing a compilation on MSVC, applying a patch and then
recompiling (because that's just faster than recompiling the whole).
Perhaps we could do better here. I am not completely sure what
though, it's not a problem I have spent much brain-time on.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2019-12-04 05:01:18 | Re: Windows buildfarm members vs. new async-notify isolation test |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2019-12-04 04:47:35 | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |