Re: fe-utils - share query cancellation code

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fe-utils - share query cancellation code
Date: 2019-12-02 02:54:02
Message-ID: 20191202025402.GB1696@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 08:44:25AM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> I do not have a Windows host, so I can only do blind tests. I just moved the
> declaration out of !WIN32 scope in attached v7, which might solve the
> resolution error. All other issues pointed out above seem fixed in the v6
> you sent.

Committed the patch after splitting things into two commits and after
testing things from Linux and from a Windows console: the actual
refactoring and the pgbench changes. While polishing the code, I have
found the upthread argument of Ibrar quite appealing because there are
use cases where a callback can be interesting on Windows, like simply
being able to log the cancel event to a different source. So I have
removed the callback restriction and the assertion, making the
callback of psql a no-op on Windows. A second thing is that two large
comments originally in psql had better be moved to cancel.c because
the logic with libpq cancel routines applies only there.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2019-12-02 03:05:06 Re: Bogus EXPLAIN results with column aliases for mismatched partitions
Previous Message Takuma Hoshiai 2019-12-02 02:05:38 Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance