Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, hoshiai(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance
Date: 2019-12-01 02:55:14
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 06:19:54PM +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> Sorry, an unfinished line was left... Please ignore this.

A rebase looks to be necessary, Mr Robot complains that the patch does
not apply cleanly. As the thread is active recently, I have moved the
patch to next CF, waiting on author.

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-01 02:57:28 Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-01 02:50:54 Re: pglz performance