| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp |
| Cc: | ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, hoshiai(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance |
| Date: | 2019-11-29 04:46:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20191129.134605.1048192973785037539.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> But if we introduce IMV, IVM would be used in much less places in the
>> doc and source code, so less confusion would happen, I guess.
>
> Make senses. However, we came to think that "Incrementally Maintainable
> Materialized Views" (IMMs) would be good. So, how about using this for now?
> When other better opinions are raised, let's discuss again
Sounds good to me.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey Borodin | 2019-11-29 05:18:18 | Re: pglz performance |
| Previous Message | Yugo Nagata | 2019-11-29 04:00:53 | Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance |