| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera from 2ndQuadrant <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: amcheck verification for GiST |
| Date: | 2019-11-28 03:57:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20191128035710.GP237562@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 04:10:20PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Why is this not a problem for the new amcheck checks? Maybe this is a
> very naive question. I don't claim to be a GiST expert.
This thread did not receive any updates after a couple of months, and
visibly input was waited from Andrey, so I am marking it as returned
with feedback in the CF. Please feel free to update the CF entry or
register a new entry once you have dealt with the comments from Peter
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | nuko yokohama | 2019-11-28 04:00:05 | To Suggest a "DROP INCREMENTAL MATERIALIZED VIEW" in psql, but the syntax error when you run. |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-11-28 03:53:34 | Re: Add a GUC variable that control logical replication |