Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, sk(at)zsrv(dot)org, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots
Date: 2019-11-28 03:09:03
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 05:08:07PM +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> I wonder if this is useful to show these messages for slots that were already
> dead before this checkpoint?

This thread has been waiting for input from the patch author,
Horiguchi-san, for a couple of months now, so I am switching it to
returned with feedback in the CF app.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 2019-11-28 03:18:59 RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2019-11-28 03:01:25 Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs