Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: "nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Kyotaro HORIGUCHI' <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "'robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com'" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq
Date: 2019-11-27 08:31:54
Message-ID: 20191127083154.GC237562@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 04:25:07PM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> Not this round.

You have registered yourself as a reviewer of this patch since the end
of June. Could you please avoid that? Sometimes people skips patches
when they see someone already registered to review it.

The patch applies cleanly so I am movingit to next CF.

(FWIW, I still have the same impression as upthread, looking again at
the patch, but let's see if there are other opinions.)
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeevan Chalke 2019-11-27 08:38:31 Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-27 08:26:19 Re: allow_system_table_mods stuff