Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Smith, Peter" <peters(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Joe Nelson <joe(at)begriffs(dot)com>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays
Date: 2019-11-27 08:23:42
Message-ID: 20191127082342.GA237562@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 04:50:22AM +0000, Smith, Peter wrote:
> I thought this submission actually started out very popular, but
> then support slowly eroded, and currently seems headed towards a
> likely rejection.

Yeah, it seems to me that this tends to be a rejection, and the thread
has actually died. As we are close to the end of the CF, I am just
updating the patch as such.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-27 08:26:19 Re: allow_system_table_mods stuff
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-27 08:20:52 Re: [proposal] de-TOAST'ing using a iterator