Re: [proposal] de-TOAST'ing using a iterator

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Binguo Bao <djydewang(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Владимир Лесков <vladimirlesk(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [proposal] de-TOAST'ing using a iterator
Date: 2019-11-27 08:20:52
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 09:55:24PM +0800, Binguo Bao wrote:
> Personally, I prefer patch v10. Its performance is superior, although it
> exposes some struct details.

Please be careful. The patch was waiting for author input, but its
latest status does not match what the CF app was saying. I have moved
this patch to next CF, with "Needs review" as status.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-27 08:23:42 Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-27 08:17:06 Re: Run-time pruning for ModifyTable