| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Binguo Bao <djydewang(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Владимир Лесков <vladimirlesk(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [proposal] de-TOAST'ing using a iterator |
| Date: | 2019-11-27 08:20:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20191127082052.GE221153@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 09:55:24PM +0800, Binguo Bao wrote:
> Personally, I prefer patch v10. Its performance is superior, although it
> exposes some struct details.
Please be careful. The patch was waiting for author input, but its
latest status does not match what the CF app was saying. I have moved
this patch to next CF, with "Needs review" as status.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-11-27 08:23:42 | Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-11-27 08:17:06 | Re: Run-time pruning for ModifyTable |