| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Hubert Zhang <hzhang(at)pivotal(dot)io>, hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: accounting for memory used for BufFile during hash joins |
| Date: | 2019-11-25 18:11:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20191125181119.ieiu2ndh2kget4v3@development |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 05:33:35PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:47:51PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> My feeling is that we should get the BNLJ committed first, and then maybe
>> use some of those additional strategies as fallbacks (depending on which
>> issues are still unsolved by the BNLJ).
>
>The glacier is melting more. Tomas, what's your status here? The
>patch has been waiting on author for two months now. If you are not
>planning to work more on this one, then it should be marked as
>returned with feedback?
I'm not planning to do any any immediate work on this, so I agree with
marking it as RWF. I think Melanie is working on the BNL patch, which
seems like the right solution.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-11-25 18:15:34 | Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page |
| Previous Message | vignesh C | 2019-11-25 17:51:49 | Re: dropdb --force |