Re: [PATCH] Tiny optmization or is a bug?

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Ranier Vilela <ranier_gyn(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tiny optmization or is a bug?
Date: 2019-11-22 22:14:52
Message-ID: 20191122221452.lvos246pyygacean@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 09:51:50PM +0000, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>Hi,
>Maybe this is a real bug.
>
>The assignment has no effect, or forget dereferencing it?
>
>Best regards.
>Ranier Vilela
>
>--- \dll\postgresql-12.0\a\backend\commands\lockcmds.c Mon Sep 30 17:06:55 2019
>+++ lockcmds.c Fri Nov 22 18:45:01 2019
>@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@
>
> LockViewRecurse_walker((Node *) viewquery, &context);
>
>- ancestor_views = list_delete_oid(ancestor_views, reloid);
>+ list_delete_oid(ancestor_views, reloid);
>
> table_close(view, NoLock);
> }

This was already reworked in the master branch by commit d97b714a219.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tels 2019-11-22 22:15:29 Re: backup manifests
Previous Message Ranier Vilela 2019-11-22 22:10:29 RE: [PATCH] Tiny optmization.