Re: [PATCH][BUG FIX] Pointer arithmetic with NULL

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Ranier Vilela <ranier_gyn(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BUG FIX] Pointer arithmetic with NULL
Date: 2019-11-22 20:07:41
Message-ID: 20191122200741.rtt2chpc7ni7thhj@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 05:19:11PM +0000, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>Hi,
>Pointer addition with NULL, is technically undefined behavior.
>
>Best regards.
>Ranier Vilela
>
>--- \dll\postgresql-12.0\a\backend\access\transam\xlog.c Mon Sep 30 17:06:55 2019
>+++ xlog.c Fri Nov 22 13:57:17 2019
>@@ -1861,7 +1861,7 @@
> {
> Assert(((XLogPageHeader) cachedPos)->xlp_magic == XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC);
> Assert(((XLogPageHeader) cachedPos)->xlp_pageaddr == ptr - (ptr % XLOG_BLCKSZ));
>- return cachedPos + ptr % XLOG_BLCKSZ;
>+ return ptr % XLOG_BLCKSZ;
> }
>
> /*

But the value is not necessarily NULL, because it's defined like this:

static char *cachedPos = NULL;

that is, it's a static value - i.e. retained across multiple calls. The
question is whether we can get into that branch before it's set, but
it's certainly not correct to just remove it ...

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-11-22 20:11:09 Re: Why overhead of SPI is so large?
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-11-22 19:44:40 Re: WAL archive is lost