| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Yuli Khodorkovskiy <yuli(dot)khodorkovskiy(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)heterodb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Mike P <mike(dot)palmiotto(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: add a MAC check for TRUNCATE |
| Date: | 2019-11-22 08:07:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20191122080736.GK42684@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 02:30:12PM -0500, Joe Conway wrote:
> I tested this successfully on Rhinoceros, both with and without
> "db_table: { truncate }" loaded in the policy. Updated patches attached
> here with some editorialization. If there are no objections I will
> commit/push both in about a day or two.
Thanks for the update, Joe. I have switched the patch as ready for
committer, with your name as committer of the entry to reflect this
status.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2019-11-22 08:15:51 | Re: Why overhead of SPI is so large? |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2019-11-22 08:05:19 | Re: Why overhead of SPI is so large? |