Re: [PATCH] Do not use StdRdOptions in Access Methods

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dent John <denty(at)qqdd(dot)eu>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Iwata, Aya" <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not use StdRdOptions in Access Methods
Date: 2019-11-22 07:44:50
Message-ID: 20191122074405.GF42684@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:01:54AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> The latest patch looks good to me, except, maybe the comment of
> StdRdOptions should be updated:
>
> * StdRdOptions
> * Standard contents of rd_options for heaps and generic indexes.
>
> IIUC, StdRdOptions no longer applies to indexes, right?

Noted, thanks. I'll sit on this thing for a couple of days, and will
likely look at it again on Monday in order to commit it.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2019-11-22 07:48:11 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-22 07:34:05 Re: [PATCH] Do not use StdRdOptions in Access Methods