| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pg_shmem_allocations view |
| Date: | 2019-11-18 18:01:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20191118180157.blnfvu4wxkw5savu@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2019-11-18 21:49:55 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> +/* SQL SRF showing allocated shared memory */
> +Datum
> +pg_get_shmem_allocations(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
> This could be more talkative.
I don't really see what it'd say, except restate the function name as a
sentence? I think that kind of comment has negative, not positive value.
- Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | parveen mehta | 2019-11-18 18:24:11 | Re: Postgres on IBM z/OS 2.2.0 and 2.3.0 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-11-18 17:49:50 | Re: Reverse collations (initially for making keyset pagination cover more cases) |