From: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Böhm <dudleyperkins(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-pkg-debian(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: postgis update from 2.5 to 3 |
Date: | 2019-11-13 12:27:07 |
Message-ID: | 20191113122707.GB3741@msg.df7cb.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-pkg-debian |
Re: Michael Böhm 2019-11-13 <CAKJYtETxgMiGze5hcjhgGOy_4B4wh8YfL6nnKE_UxkwO6iFwjA(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> > Interesting... I would have thought that upgrading didn't need the old
> > files.
> >
>
> Well it looked like this:
>
> edugis=# SELECT PostGIS_full_version();
> FEHLER: konnte nicht auf Datei »$libdir/postgis-2.5« zugreifen: Datei oder
> Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
> KONTEXT: SQL-Anweisung »SELECT public.postgis_lib_version()«
> PL/pgSQL-Funktion postgis_full_version() Zeile 26 bei SQL-Anweisung
Ok, that's missing the old *libs*, that's somewhat expected.
> > Which versions of the -2.5 and -3 packages exactly did you use?
> >
>
> Well i always try to update asap so before i had:
> ii postgresql-10-postgis-2.5 2.5.3+dfsg-2.pgdg100+1
> ii postgresql-10-postgis-2.5-scripts 2.5.3+dfsg-2.pgdg100+1
> and now
> ii postgresql-10-postgis-3 3.0.0+dfsg-2~exp1.pgdg100+1
> ii postgresql-10-postgis-3-scripts 3.0.0+dfsg-2~exp1.pgdg100+1
Thanks, I'll see what I can do about the file conflicts. It will
likely take until next week, however.
Christoph
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | apt.postgresql.org Repository Update | 2019-11-14 12:50:21 | postgresql-12 updated to version 12.1-1.pgdg+1 |
Previous Message | Michael Böhm | 2019-11-13 09:49:46 | Re: postgis update from 2.5 to 3 |