| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: errbacktrace |
| Date: | 2019-11-08 18:52:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20191108185246.GA17609@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Oct-26, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I hadn't realized that you had already attached a patch that implements
> your idea. It looks good to me. Maybe a small comment near
> check_backtrace_functions() why we're not using a regular list. Other
> than that, please go ahead with this.
Thanks, I added that comment and others, and pushed. Let's see what
happens now ...
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashwin Agrawal | 2019-11-08 19:40:59 | Re: Remove HeapTuple and Buffer dependency for predicate locking functions |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-11-08 18:35:57 | Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index. |