| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Павел Ерёмин <shnoor111gmail(at)yandex(dot)ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 64 bit transaction id |
| Date: | 2019-11-04 18:44:53 |
| Message-ID: | 20191104184453.v3hblaesodocz53z@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2019-11-04 19:39:18 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:04:09AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > And "without causing significant issues elsewhere" unfortunately
> > includes continuing to allow pg_upgrade to work.
> Yeah. I suppose we could have a different AM implementing this, but
> maybe that's not possible ...
Entirely possible. But the amount of code duplication / unnecessary
branching and the user confusion from two very similar AMs, would have
to be weighed against the benefits.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2019-11-04 18:53:00 | Re: Missed check for too-many-children in bgworker spawning |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-11-04 18:39:18 | Re: 64 bit transaction id |