Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Joe Nelson <joe(at)begriffs(dot)com>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays
Date: 2019-10-21 19:36:32
Message-ID: 20191021193632.2mm5e45dbvhh46lo@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-10-21 15:04:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> There is a general solution that works across platforms; it's called
> memset() and it's what we're using today. I'm beginning to think that
> we should just reject this patch. It's certainly not enough of an
> improvement to justify the amount of discussion that's gone into it.

bikeshedding vs reality of programming & efficiency: 1 : 0.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2019-10-21 19:50:31 Re: jsonb_set() strictness considered harmful to data
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-10-21 19:04:36 Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays