Re: BUG #16045: vacuum_db crash and illegal memory alloc after pg_upgrade from PG11 to PG12

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: buschmann(at)nidsa(dot)net, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16045: vacuum_db crash and illegal memory alloc after pg_upgrade from PG11 to PG12
Date: 2019-10-09 23:07:59
Message-ID: 20191009230759.ge66neof5qj627a2@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Well, I think I found the root cause. It's because of 7c15cef86d, which
changed the definition of sql_identifier so that it's a domain over name
instead of varchar. So we now have this:

SELECT typname, typlen FROM pg_type WHERE typname = 'sql_identifier':

-[ RECORD 1 ]--+---------------
typname | sql_identifier
typlen | -1

instead of this

-[ RECORD 1 ]--+---------------
typname | sql_identifier
typlen | 64

Unfortunately, that seems very much like a break of on-disk format, and
after pg_upgrade any table containing sql_identifier columns is pretty
much guaranteed to be badly mangled. For example, the first row from the
table used in the original report looks like this on PostgreSQL 11:

test=# select ctid, * from q_tbl_archiv limit 1;
-[ RECORD 1 ]----+--------------------------
ctid | (0,1)
table_name | _pg_foreign_data_wrappers
column_name | foreign_data_wrapper_name
ordinal_position | 5
col_qualifier | foreign_data_wrapper_name
id_column |
id_default |

while on PostgreSQL 12 after pg_upgrade it looks like this

test=# select ctid, table_name, column_name, ordinal_position from q_tbl_archiv limit 1;:
-[ RECORD 1 ]----+---------------------------------------------------------
ctid | (0,1)
table_name | 5_pg_foreign_data_wrappers5foreign_data_wrapper_name\x05
column_name | _data_wrapper_name
ordinal_position | 0

Not sure what to do about this :-(

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-10-09 23:18:45 Re: BUG #16045: vacuum_db crash and illegal memory alloc after pg_upgrade from PG11 to PG12
Previous Message Scott Laing 2019-10-09 15:20:57 Re: AW: install error

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-10-09 23:15:18 Re: TCP Wrappers
Previous Message Smith, Peter 2019-10-09 22:52:41 RE: Proposal: Add more compile-time asserts to expose inconsistencies.